nvidia gpu mobilenvidia gpu mobile

NVIDIA RTX 2000 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500

NVIDIA RTX 2000 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 graphics comparison: performance score, cores and clock speeds, VRAM, TGP, cache, and RT and AI units. The better value in each row is highlighted in green.

Summary

NVIDIA RTX 2000 offers a higher boost clock (2115 MHz vs 1545 MHz). NVIDIA RTX 3500 offers more compute units (CUDA cores: 5120 vs 3072), more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB), a wider memory bus (192 bit vs 128 bit), higher memory bandwidth (432 GB/s vs 256 GB/s), and more L2 cache (48 MB vs 24 MB).

Performance score

0

Coming soon

0

Coming soon

Key specs

CUDA cores3072
CUDA cores5120
Boost2115 MHz
Boost1545 MHz
VRAM8 GB
VRAM12 GB
Memory bus128 bit
Memory bus192 bit
TGP35–140 W
TGP60–140 W
MemoryGDDR6
MemoryGDDR6

General

SeriesRTX Ada Mobile
SeriesRTX Ada Mobile
GPU architectureAda Lovelace
GPU architectureAda Lovelace
GPU chipAD107
GPU chipAD104
FoundryTSMC
FoundryTSMC
Process node5 nm
Process node5 nm
Die size159 mm²
Die size295 mm²
Transistors18.9 billion
Transistors35.8 billion
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16
Release dateMarch 21, 2023
Release dateMarch 21, 2023

Cores and clocks

CUDA cores3072
CUDA cores5120

24× SM

40× SM

Boost clock (max)2115 MHz
Boost clock1545 MHz
Boost clock (min)1455 MHz

Memory

VRAM8 GB
VRAM12 GB
MemoryGDDR6
MemoryGDDR6
Memory bus128 bit
Memory bus192 bit
Memory speed16 Gb/s
Memory speed18 Gb/s
Bandwidth256 GB/s
Bandwidth432 GB/s

TGP

TGP range35 - 140 W
TGP range60 - 140 W

Cache

L2 cache24 MB
L2 cache48 MB
L1 cache128 KB
L1 cache128 KB

Units

TMUs96
TMUs160
ROPs48
ROPs64
RT cores24
RT cores40
Tensor cores96
Tensor cores160
SM blocks24
SM blocks40

AI

AI performance232 TOPS
AI performance369 TOPS

Other match-ups